Welcome to TruthTalkLive.com!

Today’s Issues, From a Biblical Perspective!

Should society protect Animals over Babies?

Posted by truthtalklive on August 21, 2008

Advocating for unborn victims:

Rep. Dale Folwell (R)      Joint Caucas Leader, NC House of Representatives

For more information check out www.ebonyandelijah.com and check out www.dalefolwell.com

After the show check out the podcast at www.wtru.com

Add to Technorati Favorites


4 Responses to “Should society protect Animals over Babies?”

  1. F. L. A. said

    Is this the same society that advocates the spaying and neutering of almost all cats and dogs to help rid the world of unwanted litters and overpopulation?

  2. Sarah said

    I am 11 weeks pregnant and it disgusts me that my own home state of north Carolina, as conservative as we are, would not protect my unborn child with the same rights as me! I think about how my husband and family would grieve over 2 lives lost, not just 1, and how it would be twice as devastating because of the baby. Just disgusting. Its even grievs me more that s pregnant doe is considered worthy of time in our legislature more than my own child. Shame on our state government.

  3. Ben Maulis said

    We should expect “society” to do whatever seems right in their own eyes and to commit evil abominations. What they “should” do is keep God’s commandments, but none of them do. “Therefore also said the wisdom of God, I will send them prophets and apostles, and [some] of them they shall slay and persecute.”

    One of their popular representatives was recently asked when he believed babies get human rights. Instead of answering, he said that he wasn’t paid enough to answer, saying “answering that question with specificity is above my pay grade.” This is one who aspires to be their commander in chief. He is unwilling to acknowledge when anyone actually obtains any human rights. I understand his record shows his willingness to deny even born babies those rights. Even though he apparently claims to be ignorant of when rights are obtained, he has proven to be willing to deny them and offer up born, live babies to Molech and Adrammelech and Anammelech.

    My wife and I think so differently. We fear God. Our son Mamre’s birth was imminent at only 24 weeks of gestation. To put that in perspective, the world’s record for surviving premature birth is just under 22 weeks, and the world’s smallest surviving baby was born at 25 weeks. Through a gift of faith in God’s immutable promises in Malachi 3:11 and Psalm 128, Mamre hung in there until week 25, after which he came out and has overcome Antichrist by the mighty hand of God (1 John 4:4).

    They aspire to power who observe times, and use enchantments, and witchcraft, who deal with familiar spirits, and with wizards. They burn their children in fire to Molech.

    I recently heard the testimony of a woman who testified before the US Congress about babies she witnessed left to die after they had been born at 22 weeks or earlier because an abortion had failed and labor had been intentionally induced. Although it is sad and emotionally appealing that these babies were left to die, there has been little success in sustaining their lives at these gestational ages to date. Before the babies were left to die, the crime was that labor was intentionally induced prior to the “age of viability.” God’s word is clear about the one who commits exactly this act with lucid specificity. “He shall be surely punished…” and “thou shalt give life for life.” (Exodus 21:22-23)

    Without a miracle, we are helpless when a baby well under 24 weeks of gestational age is born. This is why it is so heinous to intentionally induce labor and birth at such a young gestational age. To intentionally cause birth at an age that is unsurvivable is an evil abomination. It follows by reason that we bear the same guilt when we conceive a child under circumstances we have intentionally prepared so that it is impossible for it to survive. We cannot allow ourselves to think we are only preventing a pregnancy if we are actually killing blastocysts with abortifacient drugs.

    Hormonal birth control methods, the pill, the patch, the ring, the IUD, are supposed by many to work only by suppressing ovulation and increasing the viscosity of cervical mucous, but breakthrough ovulation is expected to occur, and when it does, an egg can be fertilized, and these contraceptives effectiveness is then ensured by the effect it has on the uterine lining (the endometrium), making it uninhabitable for the blastocyst that forms from the fertilized egg (zygote).

    If the rights of the unborn begin, “at the moment of conception,” we must also acknowledge that conception occures at fertilization. If “conception” begins only after the blastocyst implants on the endometrium, then “human life” is defined by the location of its constituents rather than the constituents, the embryonic cells themselves. With this kind of reasoning, it follows that any arbitrary location can be chosen as defining whether the life has rights or not. But if the zygote and subsequent blastocyst itself constitutes “conception,” then hundreds of millions of human babies are perishing by these abortifacient drugs, invitro-fertilization methods, and human embryonic stem cell research. Rest assured that every one of us shall give an account of himself to God. The Lord says whoa unto them which frame mischief by a law and gather themselves together to condemn innocent blood (Psalm 94). We fear the Lord who does not will that any zygote perish.

    We are too familiar that not everything is in our control. We do not condemn, but rather we empathize with those who without willing have lost children of any gestational or birth age. Remember the words of the Lord Jesus Christ who said, “Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven,” and “their angels do always behold the face of my Father which is in heaven.” The Lord also said, “And this is the Father’s will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day.”

    As ambassadors of Christ, and ministers of reconciliation, not of this world’s kingdoms, but of the kingdom of God, we entangleth not ourselves with the affairs of this life. Nevertheless, we do not fail to make known unto every man the will of him who sent us. We preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord who calls all men everywhere to repent before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by [that] man whom he hath ordained; [whereof] he hath given assurance unto all [men], in that he hath raised him from the dead.

    Those who have been blinded by the god of this world walk in darkness. We have been sent to preach the truth that the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them. The blood of Jesus Christ himself is upon us all, for all have sinned. Therefore it is preached, “Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, [even] as many as the Lord our God shall call.”

  4. bookert said

    Did dude actually say – “we don’t want to become known as the place to come if you want to murder a pregnant woman.”
    Did he actually say that?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: